Article types
- EJIS publishes academically rigorous, peer-reviewed papers of 9-12,000 words (including references) that significantly advance scholarship through original analysis of a salient policy issue, the exploitation of new data, and/or the innovative development and application of theory.
- The EJIS will also be home to occasional high-impact special issues and an annual book review symposium, as well as hosting a regular Junior-Senior dialogue section.
- Submissions to the annual book review symposium should be no longer than 10,000 words (including references).
- Submissions to the Junior-Senior dialogue should comprise an initial paper by a junior scholar of 8,000 words (including references), followed by a response from a senior scholar of no more than 3,000 word (including references) and a reply from the junior scholar of no more than 2,000 words (including references).
- It is the author’s responsibility to provide the editors with an accurate total word count for all articles on submission.
- Each paper must contain a single-paragraph abstract as well as a keyword set of between four and six words.
Peer Review Policy
All manuscripts are initially read by two members of the editorial team, who together decide whether the submission should be sent out for external review. The purpose of this desk review phase is to swiftly identify those submissions we believe to be unsuitable for the EJIS for reasons of quality, remit or area of focus, and to return these to contributors with the minimum of disruption and delay. Ordinarily, we expect to make desk review decisions within two weeks of submission.
Papers that are accepted through the desk review process will normally be sent out to three external reviewers. Our aim is to come back to contributors with a decision or recommendation within 12 weeks of submission.
The EJIS adheres to a double blind peer-reviewing policy for external review in which the identity of the reviewer and the author are always concealed from both parties.
Manuscript Style
The text should be double-spaced throughout and with a minimum of 3cm for left and right hand margins and 5cm at head and foot. Text should be standard 10 or 12 point. The EJIS uses footnotes: these should be amalgamated and signalled serially within each article by superscript numerals. References should give full biographical details, including place of publication and publisher, at first mention. Thereafter the author’s surname and date of publication should be used. If there is more than one author reference for the same year, please use a., b., etc. to differentiate between them.
Footnotes
1. Lawrence Freedman, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (London: Macmillan, 1981), pp. 51-3
2. Freedman (1981) p. 152, emphasis added/emphasis in original.
3. Bruce Cumings, ‘Japan and the Asian Periphery’, in Melvyn P. Leffler and David S. Painter (eds), Origins of the Cold War (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 226-9.
4. Simon Turner, ‘Hegemony and other US power strategies’, in Martin Adler (ed.), Time and Place, 2:6 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 195-8, ch. 9, fn. 23.
5. Alan Ford, ‘Numbers and Symbols’, New York Times (13 May 1987).
6. Maria Baker, ‘The evolution of cats and dogs’, BBC News, available at: {www.bbcnewsonline.co.uk/cats_dogs_baker} accessed 23 June 2007.
7. Cumings (1994), p. 216
8. J. P. Cornford, ‘The Illusion of Decision’, British Journal of Political Science, 4:2 (1974), pp. 231-43.
9. George W. Bush, ‘Speech to the United Nations’, Geneva (11 November 2007).
10. Tania Thomas, ‘What do we do now’, trans. Eric Sherman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 19.
Subheadings
Acknowledgements
Artwork, figures and other graphics: For guidance on the preparation of illustrations, pictures and graphs in electronic format, please visit the Cambridge University Press website. If, together with your accepted article, you submit usable colour figures, these figures will appear in colour online regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in colour in the printed version. If a charge applies you will be informed by your CUP Production Editor. For specifically requested colour reproduction in print, you will receive information regarding the costs from CUP after receipt of your accepted article.
Journal contributor’s publishing agreement
Datasets and supplemental files
Required materials typically include all data used for the analysis, specialized computer programs or the source code of these algorithms, program recodes and a file which details what is included in the data set and how the results can be reproduced. Confidential material such as the names of survey respondents must be removed. All material will be published on the website of the journal together with the online version of the article. Authors will be responsible for responding to enquiries about data replication. Other types of supplemental material including, but not limited to, images, videos, podcasts and slideshows can be hosted on the EJIS website.
English Language Editing Services
The Cambridge University Press website lists a number of third-party services specialising in language editing and / or translation, and suggests that authors contact as appropriate. Please note that the use of any of these services is voluntary, and at the author’s own expense. Use of these services does not guarantee that the manuscript will be accepted for publication, nor does it restrict the author to submitting to a Cambridge University Press-published journal.
After Acceptance
Open Access
This policy means that EJIS authors can achieve full compliance with all existing OA policies including those of the RCUK and HEFCE in the UK, the EU’s Horizon 2020 funding programme and the Australian Research Council. The HEFCE policy, which was announced in March 2014, relates to articles accepted for publication after April 1st 2016. To be eligible for inclusion in the next REF assessment, papers must be deposited in the author’s institutional repository no more than three months after they have been accepted for publication. It is the author’s responsibility to ensure that this action is undertaken.
If you or your funder wish your article to be freely available online to non-subscribers immediately upon publication (‘gold’ open access), you can opt for it to do so subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC). The manuscript submission and peer review procedure is unchanged. On acceptance of your article, you will be asked to let Cambridge University Press know directly if you are choosing this option. More information about the APC price and licensing choices can be found on the Cambridge University Press website.
*The ‘accepted manuscript’ is defined as the fully peer-reviewed version of a paper at the point where it has been accepted for publication by the journal editors but before it is sent to the publisher for copyediting and typesetting.